New field suggestion This Category is for new field suggestions. Here you can add suggestions to fields we should add to the current 360Giving standard schma. Think of the following questions before adding new fields:
About the Standard category [Standard] (1)
Adding a re-grant field [Standard] (8)
Standard Stewardship committee minutes [Standard] (3)
Recipient Organisation Type Field [Standard] (3)
It's time to discuss metadata! [Standard] (4)
We submitted a challenge to the government open standards committee [Standard] (1)
Introducing 360Giving version 1.0! [Standard] (1)
ORCID - Should we use these identifiers type as well [Standard] (2)
Planned Dates:Duration (months) field [Standard] (10)
Publishing meta data in spreadsheets [Standard] (4)
Specify State Aid [Standard] (3)
Accommodating crowdsource [Standard] (5)
New field - Beneficiary Location: Scope [New field suggestion] (5)
Do you record grants that were awarded but then returned [Standard] (3)
February 1 2018: Minor bug fixes to 360Giving standard [Standard] (4)
Should new fields be added for social impact measurement information? [New field suggestion] (5)
Grants: restricted or unrestricted [New field suggestion] (3)
Award Type field [Standard] (6)
How to deal with redistribution of a grant in the standard (AKA - regranting)? [New field suggestion] (3)
Geography of beneficiaries [Standard] (2)
Proposals for change: date formats [Standard] (3)
Dealing with publishers that cover multiple funders [New field suggestion] (7)
Codelists and 360Giving standard [Standard] (7)
Should grants have a status field? [New field suggestion] (5)
The standard doesn't support grants for individual academic work [New field suggestion] (8)
Extending grantProgramme [New field suggestion] (1)
Do we want to add percentage splits of location to grants? [Standard] (3)
Do we have any takers to extend the grant fields into a basic ontology for their area? [Standard] (3)