# New field suggestion **URL:** https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/c/standard/new-field-suggestion/7.md [Latest](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/latest.md) · [Categories](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/categories.md) --- ## [About the New field suggestion category](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/about-the-new-field-suggestion-category/26)
**Author:** [@mor.rubinstein](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/u/mor.rubinstein)\ **Replies:** 0
This Category is for new field suggestions. Here you can add suggestions to fields we should add to the current 360Giving standard schma. Think of the following questions before adding new fields: Is this something th… --- ## [New field - Beneficiary Location: Scope](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/new-field-beneficiary-location-scope/25)
**Author:** [@mor.rubinstein](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/u/mor.rubinstein)\ **Replies:** 4\ **Last updated:** [12 February 2018 15:10 UTC](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/new-field-beneficiary-location-scope/25 "2018-02-12T15:10:13Z")
As described in this Github issue: While describing the particular geographic area(s) that a grant benefit is very useful, some additional data might help classify and help users understand the scope to which this grant… --- ## [Should new fields be added for social impact measurement information?](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/should-new-fields-be-added-for-social-impact-measurement-information/170)
**Author:** [@Craig-GVE](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/u/Craig-GVE)\ **Replies:** 4\ **Last updated:** [24 January 2018 09:58 UTC](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/should-new-fields-be-added-for-social-impact-measurement-information/170 "2018-01-24T09:58:53Z")
Hello everyone! I work for Social Value UK and we are interested in the 360giving project. I run the Global Value Exchange resource and this had led to our involvement in an OECD working group on social impact data. Thi… --- ## [Grants: restricted or unrestricted](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/grants-restricted-or-unrestricted/115)
**Author:** [@alexvanvliet](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/u/alexvanvliet)\ **Replies:** 2\ **Last updated:** [27 December 2017 22:02 UTC](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/grants-restricted-or-unrestricted/115 "2017-12-27T22:02:25Z")
Interested if there is an appetite for a field on whether a grant is restricted or unrestricted. It seems like a core part of charity accounting/SORP not reflected in the 360 standard, and would I think complement the fi… --- ## [How to deal with redistribution of a grant in the standard (AKA - regranting)?](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/how-to-deal-with-redistribution-of-a-grant-in-the-standard-aka-regranting/106)
**Author:** [@mor.rubinstein](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/u/mor.rubinstein)\ **Replies:** 2\ **Last updated:** [7 December 2017 17:00 UTC](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/how-to-deal-with-redistribution-of-a-grant-in-the-standard-aka-regranting/106 "2017-12-07T17:00:49Z")
Currently, the 360Giving standard takes into consideration the simple case where a grant is granted in a direct connection to a grantee: Funding body ----\> Grantee However, we are seeing more and more cases where a gra… --- ## [Dealing with publishers that cover multiple funders](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/dealing-with-publishers-that-cover-multiple-funders/24)
**Author:** [@mor.rubinstein](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/u/mor.rubinstein)\ **Replies:** 6\ **Last updated:** [14 November 2017 12:31 UTC](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/dealing-with-publishers-that-cover-multiple-funders/24 "2017-11-14T12:31:51Z")
Currently, the standard doesn’t differ between a publisher and a funder. There can be a situation where a publisher is not the funder. For example, the Cabinet office can publish grants data for the Ministry of Justice. … --- ## [Should grants have a status field?](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/should-grants-have-a-status-field/19)
**Author:** [@mor.rubinstein](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/u/mor.rubinstein)\ **Replies:** 4\ **Last updated:** [14 October 2017 14:17 UTC](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/should-grants-have-a-status-field/19 "2017-10-14T14:17:03Z")
This topic is based on a Github issue. Should grants have a ‘status’ field to indicate ‘applications’, ‘accepted’, ‘rejected’ grants etc? Some suggested values were: Awarded In Progress Cancelled Completed Rejecte… --- ## [The standard doesn't support grants for individual academic work](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/the-standard-doesnt-support-grants-for-individual-academic-work/22)
**Author:** [@mor.rubinstein](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/u/mor.rubinstein)\ **Replies:** 7\ **Last updated:** [2 October 2017 20:20 UTC](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/the-standard-doesnt-support-grants-for-individual-academic-work/22 "2017-10-02T20:20:25Z")
The current standard does not support grants to individual academic work; rather it assumes the grants are going to organizations. While we don’t recommend to publish names of individuals when it comes to scholarships du… --- ## [Extending grantProgramme](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/extending-grantprogramme/40)
**Author:** [@davidkane](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/u/davidkane)\ **Replies:** 0\ **Last updated:** [2 October 2017 17:36 UTC](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/extending-grantprogramme/40 "2017-10-02T17:36:21Z")
I have a proposal to extend the grantProgramme set of fields to provide much more information about each programme. The information could include: application dates and deadlines amounts/duration of funding available l…