# Do we want to add percentage splits of location to grants?

**URL:** <https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/do-we-want-to-add-percentage-splits-of-location-to-grants/23>\
**Category:** Standard\
**Created:** [19 September 2017 11:26 UTC](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/do-we-want-to-add-percentage-splits-of-location-to-grants/23 "2017-09-19T11:26:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mor.rubinstein](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/user_avatar/forum.threesixtygiving.org/mor.rubinstein/32/3_2.png) [@mor.rubinstein](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/u/mor.rubinstein)\
**Post date:** [19 September 2017 11:26 UTC](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/do-we-want-to-add-percentage-splits-of-location-to-grants/23/1 "2017-09-19T11:26:22Z")

</div>

If a grant is to two or beneficiary locations, do we want to show how they split in percentage?

For example, a grant for East London supports 60% of Tower Hamlet and 40% of Hackney?  
Can grantmakers / grantees even quantify this?

[See more on the GitHub issue](https://github.com/ThreeSixtyGiving/standard/issues/62)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rachel.rank](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/user_avatar/forum.threesixtygiving.org/rachel.rank/32/11_2.png) [@rachel.rank](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/u/rachel.rank)\
**Post date:** [20 September 2017 16:07 UTC](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/do-we-want-to-add-percentage-splits-of-location-to-grants/23/2 "2017-09-20T16:07:58Z")

</div>

Some grantmakers tell us they do quantify this in their own internal systems. If we can provide them with a way to publish this data without requiring them to do anything different or new with regards to agreeing splits then that’s seems worth doing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![davidkane](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/user_avatar/forum.threesixtygiving.org/davidkane/32/80_2.png) [@davidkane](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/u/davidkane)\
**Post date:** [2 October 2017 16:51 UTC](https://forum.threesixtygiving.org/t/do-we-want-to-add-percentage-splits-of-location-to-grants/23/3 "2017-10-02T16:51:08Z")

</div>

It looks like in the standard the `beneficiaryLocation` field is an array, so this would probably be the place to put it. In fact the `beneficiaryLocation`.`description` field says:

> This could include details of the element of the activity that takes place here.

Which would probably fit what you’re suggesting.

I think it is a question about how grantees would quantify this though. It would be easiest if this reflected where the money was spent (ie for a grant that supported multiple services across the country), but if it was something like a community centre on the border between two areas then it would be difficult to say how many beneficiaries came from either side/what the intensity of their involvement was.
